As a first-generation college student in a developing country, I believed that studying abroad was the only pathway to expanding my academic world. When I was encouraged to give up a coveted international exchange opportunity so that a senior student could apply instead, I was devastated. What I did not realize at the time was that this setback would lead me to a transformative experience I had never even heard of- undergraduate research. A faculty mentor noticed my frustration, invited me into his office, and introduced me to the idea that research — asking questions, forming hypotheses, building models, working in laboratories — could open doors just as powerfully as international travel. That invitation changed the trajectory of my life.
Undergraduate research is widely recognized as a high-impact educational practice associated with increased retention, academic engagement, and persistence in STEM (Kuh, 2008). Beyond persistence, research participation strengthens a range of academic and professional competencies, including analytical thinking (Ishiyama, 2002), problem-solving (Harsh, 2017), data interpretation, scientific communication (Patrella, 2008), and the ability to design and test hypotheses (Mann, 2020). Students learn to navigate ambiguity, evaluate evidence, and translate complex findings into written and oral forms (Krüger, 2015; Lopatto, 2006). However, its power extends beyond academic skill development. For many low-income and first-generation students, research engagement becomes a formative space for identity development (Carlone & Johnson, 2007). Unlike traditional coursework, research increases student agency and autonomy by placing students in open-ended problem spaces where their ideas matter and their decisions shape outcomes. They begin to see themselves not only as STEM students but also as scientists, engineers, and problem-solvers.
Research also expands students’ access to social capital (Aikens, 2016). Through research, students gain faculty mentorship, exposure to graduate students and postdoctoral scholars, and insight into the hidden curriculum- professional norms that are often invisible to those without prior experience navigating academic or industry pathways (Haeger, 2018). These experiences cultivate confidence, communication skills, and graduate school readiness while demystifying internships and advanced study (Eagan, 2013). For students who may hesitate to raise their voices in large classrooms, research environments are often the first places where they are seen, heard, and evaluated on their ideas and contributions.
In this way, undergraduate research functions not merely as enrichment, but as an equity-centered accelerator — strengthening identity, belonging, and workforce preparedness simultaneously (Haeger, 2024).
Despite its documented benefits, access to undergraduate research remains uneven (Pierszalowski, 2021). Financial constraints are among the most significant barriers. Many research positions are unpaid, forcing low-income students to choose between earning income and gaining academic experience. Even when funding agencies prioritize undergraduate engagement, limited institutional resources and inconsistent accountability can restrict meaningful student involvement (Watts, 2015).
Awareness presents another obstacle. First-generation students may not fully understand what research entails or how to access opportunities. Some may assume they must already possess advanced technical skills or near-perfect grades to qualify. Others believe research is exclusively hands-on laboratory work, not realizing that it also includes analysis, modeling, writing, and critical thinking. Without early exposure, students may opt for summer employment over research simply because that pathway appears clearer and more immediate.
Institutional structures can also shape who gains access to undergraduate research opportunities. At research-intensive universities, faculty often prioritize graduate students and postdoctoral scholars when allocating research roles, while faculty at primarily undergraduate institutions frequently face heavy teaching loads that limit mentoring capacity. In some settings, limited laboratory infrastructure further constrains the scope of undergraduate research. These barriers do not reflect a lack of talent or motivation among students; rather, they reflect gaps in access and intentional program design.
Today, when I see a student sitting quietly in the back of the classroom — uncertain, overwhelmed, or questioning whether they belong in STEM — I remember the moment a professor noticed me. I remember what it felt like to be invited into a space I did not even know existed. That invitation changed my life trajectory.
Now, I am intentional about extending that same invitation. I do not wait for students to self-identify as “researchers.” I reach out. I create opportunities that are structured, paid, and accessible — especially for students balancing work, family responsibilities, and/or financial pressures. I design research experiences not as optional enrichment, but as foundational components of scholar development. I help students present at conferences, apply to graduate programs, and see themselves as contributors to knowledge rather than passive learners.
When considering the supports that students may need, conference travel funding, in particular, can be transformative. For some students, presenting research at a national meeting means more than sharing findings. It may be their first time boarding a plane, navigating professional travel, or preparing for a formal conference setting. These experiences build confidence, cultural fluency, and professional identity in ways that extend far beyond the laboratory (Mabrouk, 2009; O’Connor, 2022). Students are not only learning science; they are learning how to inhabit professional spaces.
If undergraduate research is to function as an equity strategy, institutions must design intentional pathways rather than rely on informal access. Research opportunities should be funded and paid so that low-income students are not forced to choose between academic development and financial stability. Early exposure is essential. Research-oriented seminars, often reserved for graduate students, can be adapted for first- and second-year undergraduates to demystify expectations and build foundational skills. Research projects intentionally designed for early-career students reduce the perception that research is only for advanced or high-performing students.
Structured mentoring models are equally critical across institution types. Faculty at both research-intensive universities and primarily undergraduate institutions benefit from training in inclusive mentoring practices that scaffold growth rather than assume prior experience (Sorkness, 2013). Institutions can further support this work by engaging career centers, libraries, and student success offices in offering workshops on research skills, professional communication, and graduate pathway navigation. Partnerships with national laboratories, industry, and interdisciplinary collaborators can expand funding and opportunity and normalize research as a core component of undergraduate education rather than an optional add-on.
Designing equitable research pathways requires more than isolated programs — it demands institutional commitment and accountability. Institutions should track outcomes regarding who participates in research, disaggregating data by income level and first-generation status to identify gaps in access. Funding structures, promotion criteria, and resource allocation must reflect the value of undergraduate mentorship, particularly in settings with high teaching loads or limited infrastructure.
Years ago, a single faculty invitation altered my academic trajectory. Today, we have the opportunity to design systems that ensure such invitations are not accidental but accessible to all students — especially those with talent but without inherited networks. By treating research engagement as infrastructure rather than enrichment, institutions can cultivate scholar pathways that extend beyond graduation and strengthen equity across the STEM workforce.
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the undergraduate students whose curiosity, persistence, and creativity continue to shape her perspective on research mentorship. She also thanks the faculty mentors who introduced her to undergraduate research early in her career and inspired her commitment to expanding access to research opportunities. The perspectives shared in this article are shaped in part by the author’s experiences working with undergraduate researchers through NSF S-STEM, DOE- FAIR initiatives and the ACURA (Abington College Undergraduate Research Activities) program at Penn State Abington.
References
Aikens, M.L., Sadselia, S., Watkins, K., eVANS, m., Eby, L.T., Dolan E.L, (2016), A Social Capital Perspective on the Mentoring of Undergraduate Life Science Researchers: An Empirical Study of Undergraduate–Postgraduate–Faculty Triads,CBE—Life Sciences Education,15,1-15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0208
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Eagan Jr. M.K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M.J., Garcia, G.A., Herrera, F.A., Garibay, J.C (2013), Making a Difference in Science Education: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs, American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4, 683-713
Haeger, H., Bueno, E.H., Sedlacek, Q. (2024), Participation in Undergraduate Research Reduces Equity Gaps in STEM Graduation Rates, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23,1 https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-03-0061
Haeger, H., Fresquez,.C, Banks, J., Smith, C.A. (2018), Navigating the Academic Landscape: How Mentored Research Experiences Can Shed Light on the Hidden Curriculum, Council on Undergraduate Research Quartely, 2(1), 15-23 https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/2/1/7
Harsh, J.A., Esteb, J.J, Matese, A. Evaluating the development of chemistry undergraduate researchers’ scientific thinking skills using performance-data: first findings from the performance assessment of undergraduate research (PURE) instrument, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 472-485, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151494845
Ishiyama, J. T. (2002) Does Early Participation in Undergraduate Research Benefit Social Science and Humanities Students, College Student Journal, 36,380, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:141041075
Krüger, S. (2015), Embedding Student Research in the Undergraduate Curriculum: Learning in the Field,Teaching and Learning Conference 2015, Liverpool John Moores University, 17-18 June, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:63531611
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U).
Lopatto, D. (2006), Undergraduate Research as a Catalyst for Liberal Learning, Washington, 8, 1, 22-25. Undergraduate Research as a Catalyst for Liberal – ProQuest
Mann, G.R., Bishop, T., Kaiser K.A. (2020), College2Youth: Design of Multidisciplinary Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Experience, Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 52,4, 447-450, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:199540682
Mabrouk, P., Survey Study Investigating the Significance of Conference Participation to Undergraduate Research Students, Journal of Chemical Education, 86,11, https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1335
O’Connor,.B.H, Kirsch, H., Nicole, M. (2022) “I learned that I don’t have to change”: migrant/seasonal farmworker undergraduates’ experiences at academic conferences, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 37:2, 564-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2097746
Patrella, J.K, Jung A. (2008), “Undergraduate Research: Importance, Benefits, and Challenges,” International Journal of Exercise Science: 1, 3, 91 – 95, https://doi.org/10.70252/MXRI7483
Pierszalowski,S., Bouwma-Gearhart,J., Marlow, L. (2021), A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under-Researched Factors for Students of Color, Soc. Sci. 2021, 10, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10090328
Sorkness, C.A., Pharm, D., Pfund C., Asquith, P., Drezner M.C., Research Mentor Training: Initiatives of the University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Clinical and Translational Science, 6,4,1752-8054, https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12085
Watts, S.M., George, M.D., Levey,D. (2015) Achieving Broader Impacts in the National Science Foundation, Division of Environmental Biology,BioScience, 65,4, https://www.jstor.org/stable/90007260
